Bigfoot updates

DNA is absolutely essential in the scientific community to prove that something is a new or recognized species. You have eyewitness accounts from tens of thousands of people who say they have encountered Bigfoot, some coming forward with blurry videos and photographs. But that is just not going to cut it.

What we need is indisputable genetic evidence to really put this mystery to rest. What does this all mean? Did they find Bigfoot? Although acting is his profession, researching the strange and unexplained, along with crypto-zoological creatures, are his passion. He can be found on Twitter , Instagram and Facebook. For nearly two decades, she has been a wildlife correspondent reporting on wildlife and habitat loss while advocating for solutions to the alarming trends.

A two-time Emmy Award-nominated field correspondent for the National Geographic Channel, Mayor reports to audiences worldwide on pertinent wildlife and habitat issues. Raised in the mountains of Montana, Accord takes a solid scientific approach to his Bigfoot research. He can be found on Twitter , Instagram and Facebook , as well as the Web.

Ronny was the first person ever to cast a Bigfoot print in the Bay State from a trackway discovered by a couple in Leominster State Forest in the summer of That would have to be a pretty large human to be a person inside of a costume.

You don't see Bigfoot impersonators in costumes that realistic The gait is a normal walking gait - nothing bearish or ape-like about it. Another analysis over on UnexplainedMysteries. Enthusiasts commenting on YouTube seemed fairly divided - with some seemingly convinced, while others remained dubious, saying it's hard to tell if we're not seeing the full clip. One said: " This footage is better then the Patterson Gimlin footage. Best I have ever seen. Another person wrote: " All the movements are right especially the way it picks up it's leg, and it's built about the same as a white BF that I seen years ago.

No way it's someone in a suit. It's either real or someone spent a lot of time and money making a CGI video. A third added: "What human is built in the neck like that A potential naysayer, meanwhile, commented: " Only problem about this video is, why wouldn't they continue to record? Another agreed: " There's nothing here that can't be faked. Where's the human shot in the same location for scale? Why is there no story?